shares
Comfortable full leather lining eye-catching unique detail to the toe low ‘cut-away’ sides clean and sleek harmony.
Adamson Janny
HGS talks with Josh Greenberg about listening-led social care
Social care is where early warning signals show up first, especially in retail. A store-level issue, a product complaint, a brand reputation concern, or a service miss can turn into a public moment fast. The teams that stay in control treat social care as not only a “canary in the coal mine,” but also a foundational, underlying operating system. They have the people, the playbook, and the automation to triage what matters, plus the analytics and crisis coordination plan when pressure spikes. That’s how social care becomes an early warning system for retail operations.
We sat down with Josh Greenberg, Vice President of Account Management and Interactive Delivery and resident social care expert at HGS, to share what this looks like in practice and how teams move from reactive response work to an anticipatory, repeatable model they can apply every day.
You’ve worked across social engagement, community management, and customer care. What experiences taught you what "good" social care really looks like?
When retail and QSR leaders say social care is overwhelming, is it the volume, speed, risk, or all of these factors?
That and so much more! Most social leaders have a full plate that’s nearly impossible to manage solo. The pressure shows up as volume, speed, and risk.
The volume is relentless. Owned conversation never stops, and earned chatter adds another layer. You’re sorting, categorizing, deciding where to respond, figuring out what matters, and trying to pull insight from a lot of noise.
The speed is unforgiving. Customers expect quick, actionable responses. Full stop. Miss that window and you lose trust, and it happens in public.
The risk is constant. Social is a 24/7 environment for issues. You have to spot patterns early, connect the dots fast, and make decisions before a moment turns into a crisis. If it’s handled poorly, trust erodes quickly, followers leave, and competitors can take advantage of the weakness.
The “MORE” is what all this creates behind the scenes. Social leaders end up juggling content, community, care, reporting, and crisis coordination at the same time. They’re also managing internal stakeholders and approvals, keeping brand voice consistent across team members and shifts, and deciding what should stay public versus move private. That level of context-switching is what burns leaders and teams out.
I ran into this when I built a social media center of excellence from the ground up with a limited headcount for a well-known brand. We had to get clear on what the centralized team owned, and lean on partners for the coverage and support we couldn’t staff internally.
When I compared notes with peers, most teams were stuck in reactive mode. Complaints and crises ate the budget. Their social channel presence started to look like a cost center instead of a revenue generator, even though it was flagging and managing real business risk.
The way to work your way out of this reactive mode is through a model that starts with deep listening and clear prioritization. That helps you focus on what matters, manage reactive care without drowning, and make room for proactive work that leadership actually values.
Where do social care programs break first: people, process, or tooling—and what do you fix first to get control fast?
Good question. Social care programs almost never break because of bad tools. They break because ownership is unclear and escalation paths aren’t defined. People and processes fail first, and teams reach for technology to solve a structural problem.
Here’s what it looks like: volume spikes from a product issue, a viral complaint, or a news cycle. Suddenly nobody knows who answers what, how fast, or when to pull in legal or PR. Response times slip, tone gets inconsistent, and brand trust takes a hit.
To get control fast, we start with governance and workflow.
First, lock in roles and escalation processes. Define who can respond, who can approve, and what triggers an escalation across channels and scenarios.
Next, set a tiered response framework. Sort inbound messages by type, urgency, and required action, then map a clear path for each.
Then, tighten tagging. Leverage your SMMS and team to label both inbound and outbound messages. A consistent taxonomy makes the data usable. It lets you spot patterns, report trends, and justify resourcing.
Finally, standardize response guidance. Teams need scenario-based tone examples, approved language for sensitive topics, and clear boundaries for legal review.
Once that foundation is in place, the people alignment follows, and most brands can get more out of the tools they already have. Listening is the one area where tooling really matters. If you can’t see emerging themes and indirect mentions, you’re reacting too late.
What does a “listening-led social care” operating model look like in practice?
It’s always on. Listening only works when it’s wired into how the team runs day to day, not saved for a weekly recap. Just like an operating system is the foundation of your everyday office work with Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, or Excel, social listening is the foundation of social care excellence.
In practice, we’re using technology to pull in the full conversation across owned and earned channels, even across geographies and languages, then translating what we see into something the business can act on, ideally proactively. That means spotting patterns early, deciding what matters now, and getting the right issues to the right owners fast.
Social leaders must marry the use of deep listening software with strategic support processes. Listening tools collect from hundreds of data sources to provide conversation trends, content themes, sentiment reporting, crisis and reputation insights, influencer identification (and even their motivations), and competitive tracking.
When you have optimized software with a team that is using proven processes and thinking strategically, you’ll usually see three outputs show up:
Brand reputation. Real-time analysis to uncover risk and crises. You’re catching sentiment signals early, tightening escalation, and staying ahead of what could spiral.
Brand love. Real-time trend analysis to assess cultural relevance and brand engagement opportunities. You’re seeing what’s resonating, what’s shifting, and where the brand can show up in a way that feels timely and authentic.
Look-back intelligence. Retrospective analysis to assess future channel or content strategies, trends, and trend analysis and white space definition for the brand. (Are you truly and uniquely “owning” the message or are you just a small part of a broader dialogue?) You’re using what happened to make smarter decisions about what to do next, and where there’s an opportunity you’ve been missing.
The common thread is that listening turns into action, and action turns into learning. Over time, the team gets faster, more consistent, and a lot less reactive because the signals are organized and the response paths are clear.
How should retail/QSR teams structure social care for scale? What roles are non‑negotiable, and what can be outsourced/partnered?
Retail and QSR social care is 24/7/365. You’ve got high volume, location-specific issues, loyalty friction, and moments that can turn fast. If you don’t structure for scale, the team ends up in survival mode.
Two roles need to stay internal:
First is brand voice ownership. Someone on the inside has to own how the brand sounds across responses. That includes tone, guardrails, and alignment with marketing, comms, frontline sales, customer service/CX, and leadership. You can support it with a partner, but you can’t outsource the standard.
Second is escalation ownership. Someone internal needs to decide when an issue becomes a crisis, when legal needs to weigh in, when PR needs to be pulled in, and how quickly all of this needs to happen. A partner can follow the rules, but the authority must sit with the brand.
Most of the volume and scale work can be partnered:
Coverage and moderation are big ones. A lot of teams underestimate what it takes to support peaks, weekends, and campaign surges while keeping response times tight.
Analytics and reporting can be partnered, too. A dedicated function that tracks volume, sentiment shifts, issue categories, and care performance gives leaders what they need to staff and invest with confidence. Committing to better reporting means moving beyond a collection of platform metrics and toward a structured reporting framework that maps data to real, strategic business drivers that executives care about. When that type of data interpretation is in place, the social team earns a seat at the table—not because the team advocated for it, but because the data gleaned from social about the state of the business is too useful to ignore.
Crisis support is another smart place to lean on a partner. When something hits, you want instant surge capacity and someone who can coordinate the workflow across social, PR, and leadership without adding chaos.
The goal of a partner isn’t to replace what’s working. It’s to cover the operational load so your internal leaders can stay focused on the decisions and direction only they can own.
What metrics matter in social care beyond “engagement,” and how do leaders prove impact to Operations and CX?
Likes, shares, and follower growth don’t translate to Operations or CX. If you lead with impressions in a business review, you’re going to lose the room.
The metrics that land are the ones tied to service quality, issue resolution, sales, and cost.
Start with speed and resolution: how fast you’re acknowledging inbound issues, and how often you’re actually resolving them in social.
Then track deflection. How many issues get handled in social that would have turned into a call, a ticket, or a store visit? That’s a real cost conversation, and Ops understands it quickly.
Sentiment matters, too, but only when it’s specific. Leaders need to know what changed, where it changed, and what drove it. When you can tie sentiment shifts to a store, a product line, a daypart, or a campaign, it becomes operational signal.
If you happen to have any numbers or examples of how a social interaction led to a customer visiting a store or putting additional products in their basket, call them out!
Voice of the customer is the other big lever. Social is unfiltered and real time. If you tag issues consistently, patterns show up fast. Repeated complaints about a location, a menu item, a loyalty experience, or a service breakdown tell you something upstream needs attention.
For senior leaders, it helps to connect this work to retention and loyalty. Strong resolutions protect repeat visits and reduce churn, especially when you can link improvements to outcomes the business already tracks.
The goal is a simple scorecard executives can act on. Include a few measures that show speed, resolution, sentiment by location, issue severity, escalation status, and whether an owner took action. When you can report that way, social care stops being a slide at the end and becomes operational intelligence. It turns social care as a customer service function to social care as a strategic input into how the business understands and responds to its customers in real time.
What do you wish brands had in place earlier, and what should they demand from a social care partner in the first 30 days?
A lot of brands come in with years of unstructured data, no clear escalation logic, and a team that’s been reacting on instinct. The first 30 days should bring order to that.
As a client, the first thing I’d demand is clarity on what’s actually broken—where the risk is coming from, where the work is getting stuck, and what’s creating the most rework. Then you want a clear action plan and a prioritized fix list that’s assigned to operational owners. If nobody owns the fixes, nothing changes.
That’s how we run the first 30 days at HGS. We get clear on what’s broken, tie the fixes to owners, and put the workflows in place that keep the team steady when volume spikes.
At the same time, you need the basics locked in. A comprehensive playbook. Clear triage rules so the team knows what matters and what doesn’t. A consistent taxonomy so the data becomes usable. Escalation workflows so issues don’t stall or bounce around when pressure spikes. A listening tool that gathers info across media. And a process by which you can make sense of what that data means.
When that’s in place, you’ve got a response model—an operating system the team can actually build on. You’re handling volume with consistency, and you’re learning from what’s coming in so the same issues don’t repeat every week.
A real partner should not only help you grow followers. A real partner also helps you move from reacting to anticipating, and that should start on day one.
Real-Time Social Care & Brand Impact for Retail & Restaurants
Real-Time Social Care & Brand Impact for Retail & Restaurants
Related Articles
